Tag Archives: United States

Five reasons Donald Trump will be a terrible President

On the 20th of January Donald Trump will be inaugurated as President, bringing to an end a bizarre and vicious campaign, and an embarrassing and messy transition period. It is no longer possible to blissfully forget that this man has been elected 45th President of the United States. But in the deluge of constant media coverage, it’s almost easy to forget just how bad this is. So without looking at any of his actual policies, any of the people he has appointed to his cabinet, just to who he is and what he does, here are five reasons it really is that bad.

Conflicts of interest

As numerous legal experts have pointed out, Trump is completely compromised by his business interests. Running the country while owning a massive business is an impossible conflict of interest. Is a man clearly obsessed with wealth really going to make decisions on behalf of the country that hurt his own wallet?

Trump knows this perfectly well, but all his efforts to avoid having such a conflict are a joke. His whole plan essentially boils down to “trust me”. His children are going to run his business, while somehow not telling him about what they’re doing. “Trust me.” The profits (and just the profits, he wouldn’t want to make a loss) from foreign diplomats and leaders staying in his hotels will be donated to the government. “Trust me.” He won’t make any foreign deals or let his interests abroad affect his foreign policy. “Trust me”.

The fact that his attempt to deal with these conflicts of interests is so lazy indicates that he knows very well his business will influence his decisions – but just doesn’t care.

Government is not a business

This business past is also another problem – the government is by no means a business. Trump runs his own business along authoritarian lines. What he says, goes, and if you don’t like it…The government is not that sort of swift, efficient, money-making (or losing) machine. There is an entire bureaucracy of millions of civil servants and experts who need to be listened to and consulted. There are numerous parts of the government that do not make money because they aren’t designed to make money. The system does not work to benefit the man in charge, but the people who rely on it. It is impossible to micromanage and cannot be driven by profit. Yet Trump has given no inclination of having any idea of just how complex it is, and just how different from everything he’s ever known. At least if he tries to execute terrible policies he won’t do so effectively.

The Russia connection

Whether or not Russia actually has blackmail material or leverage over Trump is putin_with_flag_of_russia
impossible to say
at this point – but he’s certainly acting like they do. It is an absolutely bizarre sight to see a President-elect taking the side of a foreign autocrat above his own intelligence services, his own party members, and his nation’s allies. Putin seemingly can do no wrong in his eyes.

donald_trump_august_192c_2015_28cropped29There are two potential motives for this, both of which do not bode well. The first is simply that when Trump looks at Putin he sees a man he’d like to be – a powerful, ruthless ruler who lets nothing stand in his way. If this is his model of good governance, it doesn’t exactly suggest that Trump will cope well running a democracy.

The second possibility is that Russia indeed has something on Trump. The ‘golden showers’ story (which the media have consistently politely described as ‘salacious’) isn’t even the worst potential scandal. If Trump survived admitting sexual assault on tape, he can survive anything. But if Russia could potentially demonstrate that Trump’s team coordinated with a foreign power to undermine the elections – that’s treason, and cause for impeachment. What Russia could do with that sort of leverage is terrifying.

Foreign policy

Whether you like it or not, the US is an indispensable part of the world system. Scores of countries rely on it for security, scores more for economic prosperity, and even their adversaries rely on them to at least be fairly predictable in their stances. Again, this is not something that works for profit –  international relations is a complex web of dependencies and alliances.

It is also a web that Trump is swinging a big stick through. The only consistency has been his love affair with Putin. First off, he seems to have nothing but contempt for allies like the NATO states. The fact that alliances like NATO strengthen the US escapes him, the fact that small countries in Europe rely on the US for their security does not bother him. How are countries that the US in turn relies on for cooperation supposed to feel when Trump consistently belittles and attacks them?

Secondly though, Trump also does not understand how vital norms, clarity and tact are in creating a stable world. He doesn’t care of course, because he has always enjoying breaking the rules, but this isn’t New York real estate anymore. Sending a threatening tweet could lead North Korea to panic and launch missiles at Seoul. Failing to make very clear that the US stands behind NATO could lead to the invasion of Estonia. Insulting a foreign leader could sink not only political, but also economic relations.

Interesting times lie ahead – which is probably not a good thing.

Personality

Finally, despite his claim to have “the best temperament”, Trump manifestly does not. His public personal at least meets all 9 symptoms of narcissistic personality disorder to a scarily accurate degree – not exactly a character trait you want a public servant to have. Just about everyone who comes into close contact with him has said that he is obsessed with himself and his image, and compelled to lash out at anything he perceives as an insult. He has no regard for the truth, and seemingly feels no shame or regret when caught in a direct lie. He consistently belittles and humiliates others, especially women, and seems to be motivated by revenge and destroying his enemies. And, of course, if we are to believe what he himself and 11 women have said, he has repeatedly sexually assaulted women.

This is the man who is taking on a job requiring more patience, more self-control, more dignity, and more of a cool head than perhaps any other.

So let’s not despair or panic, give up on the US and the world watching this inauguration. But let’s not kid ourselves into forgetting just how bad this can get.

Trump and the death of truth

Today US intelligence and law enforcement agencies – the CIA, FBI and NSA – released a report stating in no uncertain terms that Russia conducted a campaign devoted to harming Hillary Clinton and helping Donald Trump win the presidency. The means of the campaign: hacking into Democratic Party servers, cooperating with Wikileaks to release harmful documents at the right times, and producing propaganda, misinformation and fake news painting Clinton in a bad light.

donald_trump_victory_tour_at_hershey_pa_on_december_15th_2016_16

Note the short fingers

Up until Election Day, the expected goal of the campaign was to undermine the expected Clinton victory and faith in American democracy. Once Trump starting winning, however, the theme of ‘this is not democracy’ was quickly dropped in favour of praising the President-elect. The final conclusion of the report is that it is highly likely that the Russian government will run similar campaigns, after this one’s brilliant success. Looking at how Russia has already managed to muddy the waters over Ukraine – meanwhile destroying the Donbas region – this is a pretty terrifying prospect.

In just a few days, however, this unbelievable series of events – Russia helping elect ‘their man’ president of the United States – will no longer matter.

Trump has managed to break the news cycle – each outrage is only news until the next outrage, and none of it seems to sink in. This report will be news for a few days, until next Monday. On Monday, six of Trump’s cabinet nominees will have confirmation hearings in the Senate, and Trump will (finally) hold a press conference on his numerous business conflicts of interest. This will all be news for a few days, until Trump does something else awful. The media is being force-fed so much news, so much scandal and lies to dig into that they simply cannot deal with it all. It’s incredibly frustrating to have to watch this happen, and not know what to do about it. What’s the point of all the outrage if no one’s listening?

And that’s the thing the media has to deal with – who is listening? The populist right, the supporters of Trump, Wilders, Le Pen, Farage, and all the rest, have tuned out. They don’t trust the mainstream media to provide them with facts, and instead get their (fake) news from Facebook. How are you supposed to debate with someone who legitimately believes Hillary Clinton is a murderer? More worryingly, the ‘anti-imperialist’ left have a similar issue. Distrust of Western governments has led them to throw the baby out with the bathwater, losing all faith in Western institutions and experts as a whole. The prime example of this is Wikileaks, which has somehow gone from exposing US war crimes in Iraq to helping an authoritarian government pick sides in an election. But it’s also something I’ve noted at my (very progressive) university studies. The critical thought that’s so vital to academia can quickly turn into the belief that nothing is really true.

Where does this leave the discussions and arguments that are vital to liberal democracies? If we’re reduced to debating what is true and what isn’t, how do we get to what should be done and what shouldn’t? Just look at the President-elect’s Twitter – a continuous mix of lies, half-truths and unfounded accusations. How do you respond to that if we can’t even agree on what the truth is? In 15 days the President of the United States will be a man who embodies the death of truth. What will this do to American democracy and by extension European democracy?

These aren’t new observations, but it is something I find incredibly frustrating. As someone working with a student organisation dedicated to debate and diplomacy, who intends to work in think tanks or foreign policy, this is not exactly an encouraging picture. All of us need to think about how we talk with people we disagree with, and how to create real debate on the issues that affect us. But as for how to do so in what seems to be (hopefully temporarily) a post-truth era – I’m not yet sure where to start.

Trump, Wilders, Le Pen – The new fascists

students_pledging_allegiance_to_the_american_flag_with_the_bellamy_salute

US students in the 40s, when this salute was still part of the Pledge of Allegience

There’s an ugly current running through Western politics, and if we’re honest with ourselves, we know what it is. Just like in Weimar Germany, from France to the US, there are people struggling with an identity crisis, scared of threats from without and within, and worrying they’re being left behind in the modern economy. And for these people, champions are rising. They are strong leaders. They say all the things, the necessary things, no one else dares to say. They will get things moving, protect the ordinary people, restore order, restore greatness, do what needs to be done. They are people like Donald Trump, Geert Wilders and Marine Le Pen. They are fascists.

There’s no clear-cut definition of fascism, and there’s no simple equivalent for Hitler or Mussolini today. However, academic Christian Caryl offers some criteria, so let’s see how Trump especially, but also the others, fit:

  • Racial purity: Wilders and Le Pen focus more on religion then race, but all of them share an obsession with an ‘other’ contaminating society and taking it over, be it “Mexican rapists and criminals”, “criminal Moroccan” or simply “Muslims”, and they will stop all immigration to get rid of this other.
  • “The state reigns supreme”: Seeing as none of them are in power, this is hard to judge, but they are certainly all extremely focused on law and order and ‘the nation’.
  • The strongman: All three, especially Trump, play on this idea of needing a strong leader, and it’s something their supporters look for.
  • Focus on the military: This is something Trump has mentioned a lot – and which is slightly less relevant in Europe – the need for a strong military and foreign policy.
  • Hatred of ‘rationalism’ and ‘decadence’: Trump almost glories in being an anti-intellectual, barely bothering to make rational arguments. All of them have attacked the current government and system for weakness, softness and elitism.
  • The Third Way: None of them are left or right, but just like the Nazi party, bring in elements of both – the rightist emphasis on law and order and the nation together with the leftist opposition to globalisation and financial elites (ironically in Trump’s case).

Now you can argue that people like Wilders and Trump are just populists, swaying from issue to issue, and that they’ll never be elected anyway. And that is certainly true, they are extremely populist. But these fascist positions are the ones on which they are running, and the ones that are making them some of the most popular politicians in the country. That can’t be ignored.

These people don’t only pose a direct threat to democracy if they are elected. Their very rhetoric poisons the atmosphere; it tells people that it is alright to voice their darkest fears and their basest hatreds. Their policies are not just free speech in a marketplace of ideas, where the good ones will win out, they are beginning to contaminate the others and sway the centre of debate. What was once extreme, now becomes acceptable.

The media plays a role in this too. Just this morning I heard an interview with Trump on ABC, where the interviewer asked “Do you regret your ban on Muslims entering the country, a policy which many have labelled un-American?” How can you ask such a question with a straight face? It’s like asking Hitler “Do you regret barring the Jews from public life, a policy which many see as anti-Semitic?’ Of course his plan is un-American, of course it’s un-democratic, and of course it’s fascist. Why isn’t that being said?

This may seem overblown, and you can argue that they will never be elected, or that their star will fade away. Fair enough, that’s hopefully and probably true. But the last time large proportions of Europe were swayed by fascism, it led to the worst conflict the world has ever seen, and the worst crime the world has ever seen – the systematic extermination of millions of Jews, Gypsies, Slavs, and many others. There are some threats that are very unlikely, but the consequences of which are so dire that they have to be faced no matter how remote they may be. Fascist rhetoric is one of those threats.

Last week Hilary Benn, in one of the best speeches I’ve seen in recent times, declared that Islamic State is fascist, and “fascists must be fought”. This is true – but sometimes the fascists are on the inside.

Superpowers in Syria – What are Russia and the US doing?

As the years go by, the war in Syria has taken on more and more of the characteristics of a proxy war, where Iran’s ally Assad fights it out against Gulf State supported militants. However, the situation is now becoming even more complicated. Over the last year the US has become directly involved, though they’re currently only targeting the Islamic State. And over the last weeks increasing reports have come out that Russia is stepping up its support for Assad, sending more shipments arms, and even looking ready to start operating an airbase. So what are these two superpowers trying to achieve? And how are they going about it? Continue reading

One official’s battle against gay marriage

In the United States same-sex marriage as a political issue is over. The Supreme Court ruled in June that all states had to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples, and this is a ruling that cannot be overturned by politicians. But while it may no longer be a political issue, its legal and cultural ramifications continue to divide the US. The case of Kim Davis, a clerk in Kentucky who refused to issue marriage licenses is the first of these big flashpoints. Continue reading

Israel and one US Presidential hopeful

Today I want to take a look at a few statements Mike Huckabee made over the weekend about his position on Israel. These statements are important because he is running for the Republican nomination for President of the United States, the most powerful office in the world. While he might not be the frontrunner, his positions on Israel and Palestine are a sign of how the Republicans are becoming steadily more one sided on this issue – one that will be a huge talking point in the upcoming candidate debates. Continue reading

Who thinks they can run the United States?

With one and half years to go until the US presidential elections, it’s already time for candidates to start declaring themselves. That’s what happens when the most important job on earth is up for grabs. All candidates for the Republican and Democratic parties will first have to fight to secure their party’s nomination, before trying to convince the country as a whole. Like always, the campaign will feature obscene overspending (something I’d like to write about sometime), and ridiculous over-analysis of every statement by the media. That’s actually something I don’t mind, as I’m a massive nerd for following the American elections. As we take a look at the main candidates at the early stage, you might get a glimpse at why this is the greatest show in politics.

As other candidates announce their campaign, I’ll add them to the list, which will be available at the blog’s header. Continue reading