Australia and asylum-seekers – What’s the big issue?

In the last month the Australian government’s policy on asylum-seekers arriving by boat has hit international news. First they had to apologise when the Australian navy entered Indonesian waters. Then Prime Minister Abbott made the news by calling the Australian national broadcaster (ABC) ‘unpatriotic’ for its investigation into treatment of refugees. On Monday it came out that the Australian Human Rights Commission would conduct an inquiry into the mandatory detention of children of asylum-seekers when they arrive in Australia. This is obviously a big issue in Australia. So what exactly is this ‘issue’? What has changed in the last few months? And why is it of such importance to Australia?

Source: BBC

A typical boat used by people smugglers

Follow this link for a simple explanation of what it means to seek asylum.

These people arriving on boats are refugees, mainly from countries like Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran or Sri Lanka. This article describes some of the reasons they had for leaving; a civil-rights activist in Kabul who faces death threats, a man who illegally converted to Christianity in Iran, another who received threats after standing for election in Sri Lanka.

These people, often with their families, head in any way they can towards Indonesia. Why Indonesia? It’s the closest country to Australia these people are able to fly to. Since Australia is an island, they can’t show up at the border and request asylum, as in most other countries. A visa is required to board a plane heading to Australia. This leaves the only option of heading to Australia on a boat, often one that is falling apart. The plan would then be to request asylum when they arrive or get intercepted by the navy and taken to Australian. Throughout this process they are not alone, but are dealt with by people smugglers, who make plenty of money off these refugees.

The way that the government responds to this has been controversial for a long time. Australia is the only country in the world that has a policy of mandatory detention for asylum-seekers and their families. This means that the people arriving by boat are locked in detention camps while their request for asylum is considered. In every other country these people are issued a temporary visa. To make matters worse, they are often left to sit for months and even years in these camps while bureaucracy fails to get anywhere on their asylum request. At the moment my family has spent 4 months waiting for the government to renew our residency in the Netherlands, leaving us in legal limbo. It’s been extremely stressful, but at least we didn’t have to live in a prison camp while waiting.

A detention camp on Nauru

Numerous Australian governments have tried to deal with the asylum-seekers by increasingly harsh methods. Under the Liberal (the more conservative party) government in the early 2000s asylum-seekers were sent to camps on the remote Pacific island of Nauru while their requests were considered. In 2007 the Labor (the less conservative party) closed the camps, but then reopened them in 2012 after the numbers of asylum-seekers increased. In 2013 the Labor Prime Minister announced plans to give the refugees asylum – in the third-world country of Papua New Guinea. Finally, after elections in 2013 the new Liberal Prime Minster Abbott announced that dealing with asylum-seekers was a military matter. The navy began towing boats back to Indonesia, and the government stopped releasing information on the subject. Since this new policy, no boats have arrived in Australia.

So why is this such an important issue in Australia? When you look at the numbers, Australia doesn’t actually receive a big proportion of asylum-seekers, only 3% of the world total. The problem is that the issue has become a political one. Both political parties use the issue to attack the other, and appeal to voters, turning into a bigger ‘problem’ than it is. This can be seen by the way the (Liberal) Immigration Minister responded to questions about children in detention:

“But the reason there are children in detention is because over 50,000 turned up on illegal boats on Labor’s watch so we’re dealing with Labor’s chaotic mess here,”

This shows that the real issue for the politicians is being able to show that the other party is ineffective. The refugees themselves aren’t so important.

Unfortunately, this sort of fear mongering by governments has happened again and again in Australia. It is a small (in population), mainly white nation in Asia, meaning it has always been easy for politicians to gain votes by appealing to people’s fear of being ‘swamped’. Talking about these people as ‘illegal immigrants’ or ‘boat people’ is both incorrect, and dehumanising. However the actual numbers and nature of the asylum-seekers are made unimportant. Fear will win the votes every time. The country needs people, and especially politicians in government brave enough to stand up against the lies and fear. Given the state of Australian politics, that could take a long time.


9 thoughts on “Australia and asylum-seekers – What’s the big issue?

  1. Kathy Harris

    This is a good summary of a complex situation. Just makes me sick to my stomach to think what Australia is doing.

  2. John

    Indeed a very complex situation without any easy answers. Yet the way it has been politicised and asylum seekers dehumanaised is quite appalling. The language used by politicians and others does not even give people the dignity of an identity – they are simply illegals. Politically asylum seekers are easy targets – simply because they can’t vote. The humanitarian issues behind why people are fleeing their country is pretty much ignored – the attitude being “it is not our problem”. Again the issue is indeed complex and no easy solutions but surely one that respects the individual, that shows compassion, that treats people with dignity should be fundamental to any solution. Looking for leaders who will actually stand up for a more compasssionate response.

    1. andreinternational Post author

      Thanks for the response! There are so many ways of looking at the situation, and the reasons for the way Australia handles it, says a lot about the mindset of the country

  3. Emily

    Great post/article (?!… you know what I mean). The way that Australia deals with asylum seekers just sickens me and, as you say, its going to take a long time (if at all!) for that mindset to change.
    What really gets me is that asylum seekers don’t just arrive in Australia by boat, some are able to arrive by air and due to their having the proper documents they are seemingly over-looked. My question is what is the difference between these people and those arriving by sea apart from one groups access to more funds than the other?
    Also, I would say that the media (along with the government) have a huge role in the manipulation of the Australian public?
    Thanks again for an insightful post.

    1. andreinternational Post author

      That’s an excellent point, and the media always seems to overlook it. The people arriving by boat aren’t “queue-jumpers” , they’re applying the same process with less money. And yeah, I wonder if it will ever change…some politicians with guts will be needed! Thanks for the interesting response!

  4. Pingback: Switzerland and immigrants – Still the black sheep? | Your World Explained

  5. Pingback: Australia to send refugees to Cambodia | Your World Explained

  6. Pingback: Is Tony Abbott the worst Western leader? | Your World Explained

  7. Pingback: Is the Australian government paying criminals? | Your World Explained

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s